Jul 31 2010

Enhancing scalability & maintainability of your JavaScript/jQuery code – JS Design patterns

Category: AJAX | ASP.NET | JavaScript | jQueryKrishna Chaitanya @ 17:29

Are you building a huge, jQuery-ASP.NET web application, which is subjected to a lot of global code changes in your client script? If yes, you should probably consider the below design pattern, which would help you have a better control on code execution.

Maintainability problem with large chunks of JavaScript code :

Imagine a web application having ~400 .js files. Each .js file would have code for AJAX calls/DOM manipulations for the respective .aspx page. But there would be some code which is redundant and can be moved to a common global function, which can be accessed by all .js files. With respect to ASP.NET paradigm, this can be compared to - your code behind partial class inheriting a base class. So whenever you have a global change, you can just change the base class and all .aspx files will have the changes.

However, there is a huge difference in the above comparison. ASP.NET has a powerful page life cycle which strictly defines which piece of code should be executed at what event. i.e., Pre Init, Init, Page Load, Pre Render etc. In the case of JavaScript, it is just dependent on ‘where you place your code’. i.e., even if you call a global function on line 1, developers can always add lines above and below it, which will mess up your code execution sequence.  This pattern is an attempt to have control on JS code execution, having Pre and Post events.

Solution- Using wrapper which can provide pre/post events:

Let’s say for every page, we need to prevent post back on click of any button. i.e., writing “e.preventDefault()” on button click events. I call this as a “Pre Event”, since this is to be executed before any click events are written.

Similarly, let’s say, for every page, we need to disable/show/hide certain controls, based on few conditions. I call this as a “Post Event”, since this code has to be executed at the end (similar to pre render event of asp.net model). So here is how we can try to enforce this.

Enhancing our chainable JavaScript library:

The following description is based on my previous article, building a chainable JavaScript library. For the global “Pre” and “Post” events, I’m going to extend the chainable JavaScript library with the “execute” method, like this:

(function(){
    var value='Hello world';
    var preInit=function(){
        console.log('pre Init');
    }   
    var preRender=function(){
        console.log('pre Render');
    }
    var mySpace=function(){
        return new PrivateSpace();
    }
    var PrivateSpace=function(){
 
    };    
    PrivateSpace.prototype={
        init:function(){
            console.log('init this:', this);
            return this;
        },
        ajax:function(){
            console.log('make ajax calls here');
            return this;
        },
        cache:function(){
            console.log('cache selectors here');
            return this;
        },
        setValue: function(newValue){
            value=newValue;
            return this;    
        },
        getValue: function(callbackFunc){
            callbackFunc.call(this,value);
            return this;    
        },
        execute:function(oldClass){
            preInit();
            var obj=new oldClass();
            obj.init.call(this);
            preRender();
        }
    }
    window.my$=mySpace();
})(); 

To explain the execute method, let’s consider the below code:

var CommonSearch=function(){
    var pageLoad=function(){
        console.log("page load operations here...");
    }
    return{
        init: pageLoad
    }
}

The above code is what resides in your ‘.js’ file. It is written in revealing module pattern. Here, CommonSearch is a constructor function and to execute it, we should say:

$(document).ready(function(){
    var objCommonSearch=new CommonSearch();
    objCommonSearch.init();
});

This does not have “Pre” and “Post” events. So if we need some global changes, we are lost! We have to manually change all 400 “.js” files. To troubleshoot this problem, if we use our my$.execute method, we can say:

$(document).ready(function(){
    my$.execute(CommonSearch);
});

Note that in the above snippet, we are not creating instance of CommonSearch constructor function. Instead, we are passing it to my$.execute, which internally calls the private “PreInit()” method first, then executes “init()” of  CommonSearch, and calls the private “preRender()” method. So, we are enforcing a particular sequence of code execution, which solves our problem.

[Note: As far as I know, 100% enforcement is impossible in JavaScript. If you are a JS Ninja, you can easily bypass whatever enforcement is set. That is the beauty of the language!!]

How this is different from using a common global function in document.ready, which can do the same functionality as my$.execute? Simple…we have good name spacing and chainability in our my$ function, which prevents conflicts with other modules.

If you are a JavaScript newbie, this article might sound a bit weird., but actually it is not so. I’m no JS guru to say this is the best approach. But this approach helped me a lot in scaling up easily and maintaining huge .js files, without any issues. If you can think of a better approach, please suggest. I’m waiting to learn..

Happy coding Smile

Tags: , ,

May 27 2010

Create a jQuery like chainable JavaScript toolbox specific to your project

Category: AJAX | Web DevelopmentKrishna Chaitanya @ 15:44

"Global variables are evil" is what the JavaScript Guru Douglas Crockford says, as they are the source of unreliability and insecurity. How elegant your code would be if you wrap your entire project's code under a single global namespace?

[Did you know? The entire JavaScript code of Yahoo's website is accessible through a single global 'YAHOO' object!]

In this article, I would like to show how you can create a chainable JavaScript library(not a library exactly, but sort of a toolbox) specific to your project. The concept is nothing new., this is how libraries like jQuery are built. It is more about understanding certain design patterns in JavaScript.

The first thing to know is:

(function(){ 
    //your code here....
})(); 

This is nothing but a self executing anonymous function. All it does is, it simply executes whatever code you write inside it and disappears after that. The private variables declared inside this function are not exposed to the global scope, unless specifically attached to the window object.

The next thing to know is about Prototypal Inheritance in JavaScript. This is a huge topic in itself and the article assumes that the reader is familiar with this concept. The idea is, in our anonymous function, we would have a private function and prototype it with our custom functions.

This is how our JavaScript toolbox looks like: 

(function(){
    var mySpace=function(){
        return new PrivateSpace();
    }
 
    var PrivateSpace=function(){
    };    
 
    PrivateSpace.prototype={
        init:function(){
            console.log('init this:', this);
            return this;
        },
        ajax:function(){
            console.log('make ajax calls here');
            return this;
        },
        cache:function(){
            console.log('cache selectors here');
            return this;
        }
    }
    window.my$=mySpace();
})();

In the above code, "PrivateSpace" is a private function which is prototyped with our desired functions. "mySpace" is a function which returns a new instance of "PrivateSpace" when executed.

As said before, our anonymous function executes once and does not expose these functions to the outer world. To expose our functions under a namespace, we should add the instance of our "PrivateSpace" to a window level(global) object. This is exactly what the last line of the code does.

So, when we say

window.my$=mySpace(); 

we are executing "mySpace()", which returns a new instance of  "PrivateSpace()" function and assigning it to "my$", which is a window level object. So if you print my$ like:

console.log(my$);

, you would get all the functions present in the "PrivateSpace()" prototype. So you can call your functions like: my$.ajax(), my$.cache() etc.

Note that each function in "PrivateSpace()" returns "this". i.e., each function returns an instance of "PrivateSpace()" and hence you can chain your methods like:

my$.init().ajax();

That's it! Now we have our own JavaScript toolbox specific to our project! So no more global functions in our projects. As said, this is nothing new to the JavaScript world,  this pattern is what jQuery uses for chaining the methods.

I have faced few problems while opting for this pattern and posted them in StackOverflow. Folks there are kind to answer and hence this article. I'm no JS guru to say this is 100% perfect, but I have implemented this without any issues in a huge project.  You may refer Chapter 6 (Chaining) in  Pro JavaScript Design Patterns which explains about this jQuery like pattern.

Do you have better ideas? Please let me know.

Happy coding :)

Tags: ,

May 15 2010

When is AJAX an overkill for your ASP.NET-jQuery web applications? Part-2

Category: AJAX | jQueryKrishna Chaitanya @ 17:22

In my previous article, I have discussed about few scenarios where AJAX can be an overkill for our web apps. I would like to add few more such scenarios in this post.

(4) Heavy dropdowns: 

A dropdown control enforces the user to select a value, preventing the entry of unwanted choices. This would make sense if a dropdown has limited options. But we tend to populate the dropdown with hundreds/thousands of options (probably this is the case with list of all cities in a country).

The scenario gets worse when we make an AJAX call to fill such huge dropdowns. There are many articles which show 'how to fill a dropdown using AJAX', but none of them stress on the limit of options. So, for a dropdown with 3000 options you are adding 3000 DOM elements, thereby degrading the performance of your page. Imagine 5 such dropdowns in a page!

Another scenario could be a row having a dropdown with 300 options, which repeats for ‘n’ times! These are unseen dangers which slow down your site.

Bottom line: Use dropdowns when you want to display limited(say ~50) elements. For anything more than this, use auto complete feature(You may choose between local/remote data based on number of records). The same rule holds good for cascading dropdowns. Keep your DOM as small as possible!

(5) Accordions: 

This is another beautiful UI technique almost similar to Tabs, the main difference being-tabs appear horizontally whereas accordions appear vertically. The problems faced in accordions are exactly the same ones which I have explained for tabs (please refer to my previous article).

Bottom line: If your page is too huge, do not fetch the entire DOM for building an accordion. On page load, build accordion structure and fetch the content of first pane only. On clicking the next header, remove markup from the previous pane and populate the current pane. This way, your page will always contain limited number of elements(though huge DOM manipulations can cause a little delay).

(6) Page load AJAX Calls/Multiple domains:

If you profile most of the web apps, they make a number of AJAX calls on page load for business functionality. e.g., If you are trying to fill 5 dropdowns on page load using AJAX calls, you are inviting performance problems.In most cases, we can get rid of such calls by injecting JavaScript objects into the page

Bottom line: If AJAX calls on page load are still unavoidable, instead of making multiple calls, make only a single call. In your web method, hit multiple controllers and fetch the desired response and club the responses using .NET’s Dictionary object. This way, you will reduce some network traffic.

You may also try to move some of your web services to different domains and access the data through JSONP.  The maximum number of parallel calls per domain in IE8/FF3 are 6. This means, by chance if you are making more than 6 AJAX calls, the remaining would be queued. By splitting your services across multiple domains, you can still make more than 6 calls in parallel!

On a closing note, I think I’m writing more of theoretical aspects without any code, but I don’t want to lose these experiences in the darkness of my memories. Following these simple guidelines helped me solve many performance bottlenecks in a large scale project. I feel this would be useful for developers at all levels while taking design decisions. Do let me know your views!

Follow me on twitter for live updates. Happy coding :)

Tags: , ,